# Recovery 01 plan: 159399 listed-ETF ingestion and failure semantics Evidence-based plan. All live evidence below was collected 2026-09-17 with bounded real calls (single attempts, ≤15s timeouts, no retries). Skill loading is recorded in the session transcript: systematic-debugging, test-driven-development, writing-plans were invoked via the native skill tool before this plan; if not visible, fallback statement: skills were loaded with the skill tool and their content is authoritative for this task. ## Symptom (reproduced) User defect: cash-flow ETF 159399, cn, 2025-12-31..2026-09-17, daily, unadjusted fails with `eastmoney failed (ConnectionError: RemoteDisconnected ...)` then `tencent fallback failed (tencent source has no listed-ETF daily adapter)`. ## Root cause (Phase 1 evidence) 1. **Eastmoney kline host is genuinely unreachable from this environment.** Direct replay of exactly what akshare 1.18.94's `fund_etf_hist_em` sends (`https://push2his.eastmoney.com/api/qt/stock/kline/get`, secid 0.159399, both with no User-Agent and with a browser UA) → `ConnectionError: RemoteDisconnected('Remote end closed connection without response')` in both cases. Hypotheses (wrong UA, missing header) ruled out. No code bug in our worker path — `_fetch_eastmoney` is correct; the upstream endpoint is refusing/dropping our connections. 2. **Tencent genuinely has no listed-ETF daily adapter.** Verified against the installed akshare 1.18.94 surface: only `fund_etf_hist_em`, `fund_etf_hist_min_em`, `fund_etf_hist_sina` exist. The existing error at `worker/data.py:124` is accurate, not a bug. 3. **A genuine alternative provider exists: sina.** Live probe `ak.fund_etf_hist_sina(symbol="sz159399")` → DataFrame, 381 rows, columns `date,open,high,low,close,volume,amount,postVol,postAmt`, prices decimal CNY, **volume unit is 股 (shares)** — cross-verified live on the same session: for stock 000001 2026-09-16 tencent reports volume 949,626 (手) while sina reports 94,962,632 (股), a consistent ×100, with identical turnover. Returns full history (no date-range parameter); the requested window must be sliced locally. Unadjusted only (no adjust parameter). 4. **Identity.** `split_identity("159399")` on an cn ETF already resolves to SZ#159399 (6-digit code not starting 3/6/9 → SZ). Preserved. 5. **Resulting behavior.** With source=auto, eastmoney fails → tencent ETF fallback is a designed explicit rejection → `provider_unavailable` failure. The failure message is truthful but the product is unusable for ETFs while eastmoney is down even though a genuine provider exists and is live. ## Adjustment behaviors per provider (verified, not assumed) - eastmoney `fund_etf_hist_em`: adjust none|qfq|hfq — currently unreachable. - sina `fund_etf_hist_sina`: unadjusted only; no date params; volume in 股. - tencent: no listed-ETF daily adapter (explicit rejection). ## Chosen repair (smallest correct change, worker only) Backend inspection: `server/src/datasets.rs` validates frequency/adjustment/ asset_type but does not pass or validate a `source` field; jobs.rs builds the fetch request without it. So the fix is entirely in the worker: 1. Add `_fetch_sina` (asset_type etf, frequency daily, adjustment none only). Local slice to requested dates; keep provider numbers verbatim (volume 股); attach `source_warnings` recording units and that eastmoney-style adjustments are not available from sina. 2. Register `sina` in `SUPPORTED_SOURCES` and in worker `ALLOWED_SOURCES` so it is both explicit and honestly reportable. auto chain for ETF becomes eastmoney → sina (same symbol, honestly labeled provider_fallback + units warning). qfq/hfq with eastmoney down still fails honestly (sina cannot serve). 3. Explicit-source semantics unchanged: `source=tencent` + etf still raises the accurate `source_unavailable` message. ## TDD steps Each step: failing test → run → minimal code → run. 1. Test: sina adapter normalizes a live-captured-shape sina frame (fixture labeled synthetic) for 159399 → SZ#159399, sliced to requested range, provider="sina", endpoint="fund_etf_hist_sina", units warning present. 2. Test: sina rejects adjustment qfq/hfq and non-daily frequency with explicit `unsupported_*` errors. 3. Test: auto ETF chain — eastmoney monkeypatched to fail → served by sina with `provider_fallback` warning naming eastmoney/sina honestly. 4. Test: explicit sina request for stock/index rejected (out of verified scope). 5. Run full worker suite; then live bounded end-to-end run of the exact requested dataset via `python -m worker.main fetch` into an isolated output dir; report exact rows/coverage/source/units; no production touched. ## Constraints honored - All network calls bounded (≤15s per call, one call per attempt, 180s wall clock via SIGALRM already in main.py). No retries, no auto-refetch of user data, no production writes, no deployment, no commits. - The user's failed dataset is never mutated; coverage/consumer decisions reported truthfully (2026-09-17 has no EOD bar yet — intraday at report time).